Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE)
Assessment summary
Needs a clear valuation case to justify owning.
Compare peers
Net Lease names covered in the tracker.
Price
$20.06
Yield
5.83%
P/(A)FFO
8.65x
Payout
1.98x
Occupancy
99.5%
Net debt / EBITDA
6.40x
Category scores
Six weighted categories make up the overall quality score. Each renders its own rationale once this name has been through a scoring pass.
Cash flow & dividend safety
AFFO per share grew from $0.44 in Q2 2025 to $0.58 in Q2 2026 (32% growth) and from $0.88 in H1 2025 to $1.11 in H1 2026 (26% growth), demonstrating steady growth. The payout ratio is conservative at 51.7% of AFFO in Q2 2026 and 54.1% in H1 2026, well below the 75% threshold. The company increased its quarterly common dividend by 6.7%, indicating active dividend growth. However, the data does not provide a 10+ year dividend history to confirm a full decade-long growth streak, preventing a perfect 5 score.
Balance sheet
Net debt/EBITDA of 6.4x places PINE at the upper bound of the 3-anchor range (5.5–6.5x), indicating moderate leverage typical of low-investment-grade REITs. Fixed charge coverage of 3.0x falls within the 2.5–4x band. The debt structure shows meaningful fixed-rate positioning through interest rate swaps on $200 million of the $369.5 million total debt, with maturities laddered across 2029, 2030, and 2031. However, the 6.4x leverage is elevated relative to the 5-anchor threshold and the company carries $167 million in commercial loans with 1.6-year weighted average remaining term, creating near-term refinancing exposure. The 99.5% occupancy and 55% investment-grade tenant ABR provide operational stability, but the balance sheet sits squarely in the manageable mid-range category rather than the stronger tier.
Operating performance
PINE demonstrates strong operating performance with occupancy at 99.5%, well above the 95%+ threshold and stable. FFO per share grew 29.5% year-over-year (Q2 2026: $0.57 vs Q2 2025: $0.44), and six-month FFO per share increased 25% ($1.10 vs $0.88), indicating SSNOI growth exceeding the 3%+ benchmark. The company completed $77 million in investments at 9% blended yield in Q2 and increased its quarterly dividend by 6.7%, reflecting confidence in cash flow generation. However, the data lacks explicit SSNOI figures and releasing spread information, preventing confirmation of the full 5-point criteria, warranting a score slightly below the maximum.
Portfolio & sector quality
PINE operates in retail net-lease, a structurally challenged sector facing secular headwinds from e-commerce and retail consolidation. While the portfolio shows strong occupancy at 99.5% and 55% investment-grade tenant concentration (Lowe's 13%, Walmart 7%, Home Depot 2%), it is heavily concentrated in distressed retail segments: home improvement (15%), sporting goods (15%), casual dining (11%), and dollar stores (10%). The weighted average lease term of 9.2 years is below the 15+ year benchmark for quality net-lease REITs. The tenant base includes several weak-credit or unrated operators (Beachside Hospitality 8%, Family Dollar 4%, GermFree Labs 4%), and exposure to challenged retailers like Dick's Sporting Goods (9%) and Best Buy (5%). The portfolio lacks the secular tailwinds, modern asset quality, or supply constraints characteristic of top-tier net-lease sectors.
Management & capital allocation
PINE demonstrates mixed capital allocation practices. The company increased its quarterly dividend by 6.7% and maintains a reasonable FFO payout ratio of 52.6% (Q2 2026), indicating some shareholder-friendly discipline. However, the company has issued 2.8 million common shares year-to-date through its ATM program at $19.31 average price, diluting existing shareholders while the stock trades at 8.66x FFO—suggesting issuance near fair value but still dilutive to per-share growth. Management appears internal-focused with CEO commentary on accretive investment yields (9% blended), yet the leverage ratio of 6.4x net debt-to-EBITDA is elevated for a REIT, constraining capital flexibility. Disclosure is adequate but not notably candid on insider ownership levels or long-term per-share growth track record, which cannot be assessed from the provided data.
Valuation
Valuation scored against the same-category peer cross-section (peer_fallback) from this nightly pass, because this name has fewer than 8 own-history points so far.
Score history
Event-anchoredIllustrative history — each point corresponds to a scoring trigger (filing, announcement, or initial coverage). At launch a name has a single point.
Sources
Sources are the exact documents used by this assessment, recorded when it ran.
Metric history
P/(A)FFOP/(A)FFO over time — 28 data points since Aug 2, 2026.
Scores are analytical opinions, not investment advice. Figures reflect the most recent data available as of the assessed date and may differ from current market values.