Chicago Atlantic BDC, Inc. (LIEN)
Assessment summary
Needs a clear valuation case to justify owning.
Compare peers
First-lien focused names covered in the tracker.
Price
$9.34
Yield
14.56%
P/NAV
0.70x
Payout
1.29x
Price / NAV
0.00x
NII per share
$0.44
Non-accruals % (FV)
0.0%
Category scores
Six weighted categories make up the overall quality score. Each renders its own rationale once this name has been through a scoring pass.
NII coverage & dividend safety
NII per share of $0.44 covers the declared quarterly dividend of $0.34 with strong cushion at 129% coverage (payout_coverage metric of 1.29), well above the 110% threshold for a score of 5. The company generated record net investment income this quarter with no non-accruals and a weighted average yield of 15.8%, demonstrating operational strength. However, the score falls short of 5 because the earnings release does not explicitly document a 5+ year history without dividend cuts, and recent market pressures in private credit are noted as industry headwinds, though LIEN's specific position appears resilient.
Balance sheet & leverage
LIEN's leverage profile sits at the band edge with mixed characteristics. The company has $54.5 million in revolving credit outstanding against $364 million in portfolio assets (approximately 15% debt-to-assets), indicating moderate leverage within typical BDC ranges. Funding is mixed: the company relies on a $100 million senior credit facility (secured) but filed a $500 million shelf registration in May 2026 to access unsecured capital markets, signaling intent to diversify funding sources. Liquidity appears adequate with $48.8 million available as of March 31, 2026, and the credit facility has no disclosed near-term maturity pressure. However, the data pack does not provide explicit leverage ratio targets, credit ratings, debt maturity ladder details, or confirmation of investment-grade status, limiting full assessment against the 5-anchor criteria of "IG-rated" and "laddered" funding.
Portfolio performance
Non-accruals are 0% of fair value as of March 31, 2026, well below the 1% threshold for a score of 5. The press release explicitly states 'there were no loans on non-accrual status.' PIK income is not mentioned in the financial statements, indicating it is negligible or absent, comfortably below the 5% threshold. The company generated net realized gains of $1.4 million in unrealized appreciation during the quarter, demonstrating positive portfolio performance momentum. All three key metrics align with the top-tier anchor criteria.
Portfolio quality
LIEN's portfolio quality falls well below the rubric's 5-anchor standard. The company focuses primarily on cannabis and lower middle-market lending, with cannabis representing a significant concentration within a cyclical, higher-risk industry despite recent federal rescheduling. The press release mentions 40 portfolio companies with $364 million in fair value, but provides no disclosure of first-lien percentage or top-10 concentration metrics. The absence of non-accrual loans (0%) is positive, but the lack of transparency on lien position and concentration data, combined with the acknowledged cyclical nature of cannabis lending and the company's own statement that "broader private credit markets have experienced pressure regarding portfolio performance," suggests a portfolio tilted toward junior capital and concentration risk rather than the defensive, granular first-lien positioning required for higher scores.
Management & fees
Chicago Atlantic BDC employs an external management structure with Chicago Atlantic BDC Advisers, LLC. The fee structure appears standard for BDCs: management fees of approximately $1.5 million quarterly (roughly 1.5% annualized on net assets of ~$304 million) and income-based incentive fees of $2.5 million quarterly. NAV per share grew modestly from $13.30 at year-end 2025 to $13.33 at Q1 2026, representing flat-to-slightly-positive performance over the short period shown. The press release emphasizes record results and portfolio growth, but the data provided does not reveal whether the fee structure includes a hurdle rate, lookback provision, or net-asset-base calculation—typical features of shareholder-friendly arrangements. Without evidence of these protective mechanisms or longer-term NAV growth trajectory, the profile aligns with a standard external management arrangement.
Valuation
Valuation scored against the same-category peer cross-section (peer_fallback) from this nightly pass, because this name has fewer than 8 own-history points so far.
Score history
Event-anchoredIllustrative history — each point corresponds to a scoring trigger (filing, announcement, or initial coverage). At launch a name has a single point.
Sources
Sources are the exact documents used by this assessment, recorded when it ran.
Metric history
P/NAVThis figure is reported by LIEN in its quarterly filing and only changes when a new filing is processed — a flat line here reflects real reporting cadence, not missing data.
Scores are analytical opinions, not investment advice. Figures reflect the most recent data available as of the assessed date and may differ from current market values.