Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC)

AgencyLimited data
Back to rankings

Assessment summary

Overall quality score
2.61/ 5
Limited data

Scored on an approximate input — this filer does not report the measure we use.

This score is banded Limited data because the dividend-coverage figure behind it could not be obtained at all — the company’s latest results did not state it and it could not be derived. The categories that do not depend on it are unaffected.

Assessed
Aug 5, 2026
Category breakdown
Cash flow & dividend safety2.0/5
Balance sheet3.0/5
Operating performance3.0/5
Portfolio & strategy quality2.0/5
Management & capital allocation3.0/5
Valuation

Price

$6.38

Yield

21.61%

P/Book

0.88x

Payout

Price / Book

0.92x

ADE/EAD per share

Category scores

Six weighted categories make up the overall quality score. Each renders its own rationale once this name has been through a scoring pass.

Cash flow & dividend safety

Weight 20%
2.0/5

ORC's dividend safety is moderately weak. Q2 2026 net interest income of $0.30 per share barely covers the $0.30 dividend declared, leaving no cushion from core operations—gains of $0.18 per share are non-recurring and volatile. The net interest margin of 1.94% is thin for an RMBS MREI, and while management notes current returns of 16.5–17% on book value are attractive, this depends on stable rate environments and leverage of 7.3x, which amplifies downside risk. The company has not cut its dividend recently based on available data, but the lack of ADE coverage above the run-rate and reliance on mark-to-market gains for safety margin places this in the "covers currently but lumpy" category rather than comfortable coverage.

Balance sheet

Weight 20%
3.0/5

ORC demonstrates a balance sheet profile consistent with the 3-anchor rubric. The adjusted leverage ratio of 7.7:1 (or economic leverage of 7.3:1) falls within the moderate range, though elevated for a mortgage REIT. Liquidity is solid at $776 million (54% of stockholders' equity) with borrowing capacity of $11.1 billion spread across 33 active lenders, indicating meaningful diversification and access. Funding is concentrated in mark-to-market repurchase agreements with short weighted average maturities of 33 days, but the company maintains adequate liquidity buffers and no recourse debt is evident. The absence of explicit recourse debt metrics prevents precise D/E calculation, but the overall structure—moderate leverage, diversified funding sources, and substantial unencumbered liquidity—aligns with the 3-anchor profile of solid liquidity despite mark-to-market repo concentration.

Operating performance

Weight 20%
3.0/5

ORC delivered a 6.21% total return in Q2 2026 (unannualized), with book value per share increasing $0.14 after a $0.30 dividend, placing economic return in the low-to-mid single digits on an annualized basis—below the mid-teens anchor for a 5 but consistent with the 8–12% range for a 3. Net interest margin of 1.94% is stable relative to the portfolio net interest spread just under 2%, meeting the 'NIM stable' criterion. Book value per share held flat at $7.22 from quarter-end to quarter-end after accounting for dividends paid, aligning with the 'BVPS roughly flat' descriptor. Management commentary indicates attractive forward returns of 16.5–17.0% available to the company given current leverage and market conditions, but current realized performance remains in the mid-range category.

Portfolio & strategy quality

Weight 15%
2.0/5

ORC operates a highly concentrated single-strategy mortgage RMBS portfolio (99.9% fixed-rate agency mortgages split 52% Fannie Mae, 48% Freddie Mac) with significant leverage of 7.7x and economic leverage of 7.3x. While the company demonstrates operational competence with a 6.21% quarterly return and net interest margin of 1.94%, the portfolio exhibits substantial credit and interest-rate sensitivity—effective duration of 3.18 means a 1% rate rise causes 3.18% portfolio value decline. Book value preservation is uncertain given the company's dependence on spread compression and low rate volatility; the earnings release explicitly notes returns are attractive only under current benign conditions (rates range-bound, low volatility, non-restrictive policy). This matches the rubric's level 1-2 profile: concentrated single-strategy with high beta to spreads and rates, lacking the diversified fee-like engines and durable BVPS characteristics of a level 5 rating.

Management & capital allocation

Weight 15%
3.0/5

ORC demonstrates mixed capital allocation characteristics typical of a score-3 rating. The company shows internal management with CEO Robert Cauley providing detailed operational commentary, and modest share issuance growth of approximately 1.5% in Q2 2026 suggests some discipline. However, the data reveals dilutive capital allocation: book value per share increased only $0.14 in Q2 2026 while dividends paid were $0.30 per share, meaning the company distributed more than it earned in book value growth. The price-to-book ratio of 0.92 and price-to-NAV of 0.88 indicate the market values the company below book, which can reflect investor concerns about capital allocation efficiency. While disclosure appears candid with detailed portfolio, leverage, and hedging information provided, the pattern of dividend payouts exceeding book value accretion and reliance on leverage (7.7x adjusted leverage ratio) rather than organic growth suggests average-to-mixed capital stewardship rather than accretive-only issuance discipline.

Valuation

Weight 10%
/5

Valuation unavailable — own-history has 2 point(s), fewer than the 8 required; total computed over the 5 model categories.

Score history

Event-anchored

Illustrative history — each point corresponds to a scoring trigger (filing, announcement, or initial coverage). At launch a name has a single point.

Sources

Sources are the exact documents used by this assessment, recorded when it ran.

Metric history

P/Book

This figure is reported by ORC in its quarterly filing and only changes when a new filing is processed — a flat line here reflects real reporting cadence, not missing data.

Scores are analytical opinions, not investment advice. Figures reflect the most recent data available as of the assessed date and may differ from current market values.