Ellington Credit Co (EARN)

CreditSpeculative
Back to rankings

Assessment summary

Overall quality score
1.95/ 5
Speculative

Distressed or broken profile — dividend and equity at risk.

Assessed
Aug 5, 2026
Category breakdown
Cash flow & dividend safety2.0/5
Balance sheet2.0/5
Operating performance2.0/5
Portfolio & strategy quality2.0/5
Management & capital allocation2.0/5
Valuation1.5/5

Price

$4.33

Yield

22.17%

P/Book

1.06x

Payout

0.79x

Price / Book

0.19x

ADE/EAD per share

$0.19

Category scores

Six weighted categories make up the overall quality score. Each renders its own rationale once this name has been through a scoring pass.

Cash flow & dividend safety

Weight 20%
2.0/5

Adjusted net investment income of $0.19 per share barely covers the current quarterly dividend run-rate of $0.08 per share (annualized $0.32), providing only 59% coverage on an annualized basis. While payout coverage sits at 0.79, the company reported a GAAP net loss of $0.86 per share and significant unrealized losses of $0.99 per share in Q1 2026, indicating earnings volatility and lumpy contributors. The earnings release shows no recent dividend cuts, but the combination of weak ADE coverage relative to dividend obligations, substantial mark-to-market losses, and acknowledged market headwinds suggest limited safety margin across credit cycles.

Balance sheet

Weight 20%
2.0/5

EARN's balance sheet shows mixed leverage metrics that fall into the weaker range of the rubric. As of March 31, 2026, total debt was $220.3 million ($166.3 million reverse repo and $54 million unsecured notes) against NAV of approximately $153 million (37.6 million shares × $4.09 per share), implying a recourse debt-to-equity ratio around 1.4:1—near the 1.5 threshold but still acceptable. However, the funding structure is concerning: $166.3 million (75%) remains in mark-to-market reverse repo, which is short-term secured financing vulnerable to repricing, while only $54 million (25%) is long-term unsecured debt. The company recently issued the unsecured notes to "meaningfully strengthen" the balance sheet and refinance repo, but the majority of funding remains concentrated in mark-to-market repo. Liquidity appears adequate given active trading and $30.7 million in quarterly CLO trades, but the heavy reliance on repo financing and modest unencumbered asset pool place this closer to a 2 than a 3 on the rubric.

Operating performance

Weight 20%
2.0/5

EARN shows mixed operating performance with significant headwinds. Net investment income of $0.13 per share (or $0.19 adjusted) is modest and insufficient to cover the $0.24 quarterly distribution, resulting in a 0.79 payout coverage ratio—indicating reliance on capital erosion. Book value per share declined from $6.08 to $4.09 (a 33% drop), though this includes the $0.24 distribution effect, still representing material BVPS erosion. The net interest margin of 0.19 is extremely compressed and stable at low levels rather than expanding. While management notes strong Q2 positioning and a 12.5% weighted average yield on the CLO portfolio, the Q1 results show negative economic returns with a $0.86 per share GAAP loss driven by $37.1 million in unrealized losses on investments. This performance falls between the 1-3 range but closer to 2 due to modest NII generation and active management efforts, though BVPS erosion and margin compression are evident.

Portfolio & strategy quality

Weight 15%
2.0/5

EARN operates a concentrated single-strategy portfolio heavily weighted to CLO debt and equity (99.9% of investments), with 52.8% in CLO equity—a high-beta, spread-sensitive asset class. The earnings release shows significant unrealized losses of $37.1 million in Q1 2026 driven by CLO equity weakness, and BVPS declined from $6.08 to $4.09 per share over the measurement period, demonstrating material erosion across cycles. While management demonstrates active trading and hedging discipline (credit hedges of $187.5 million notional), the portfolio lacks diversification into durable fee-like engines and remains fundamentally credit-sensitive with limited structural durability. The 12.5% weighted average yield on CLOs is attractive but dependent on continued spread stability and low defaults, not a preserved capital base.

Management & capital allocation

Weight 15%
2.0/5

EARN demonstrates mixed capital allocation discipline with concerning dilutive patterns. The company issued $54 million of senior unsecured debt in March 2026 and subsequently deployed proceeds into new CLO investments, but this issuance occurred while NAV per share declined during the quarter and the company reported a GAAP net loss of $0.86 per share. Book value per share stood at $4.09 as of March 31, 2026, yet the stock trades at $4.33 with a price-to-book ratio of only 0.19, suggesting significant discount to intrinsic value. While management commentary indicates active trading and hedging capabilities, the company's recent capital raises and ongoing distributions ($0.08 per share monthly, yielding 22.2%) against modest adjusted net investment income of $0.19 per share raise questions about accretion. The payout coverage ratio of 0.79 indicates distributions exceed current earnings, relying on portfolio liquidations or capital. Management appears internal-focused but the dilutive issuance pattern and reliance on external capital raises without clear book-value accretion align more with a mixed-record profile than best-in-class capital allocation.

Valuation

Weight 10%
1.5/5

Valuation scored against the same-category peer cross-section (peer_fallback) from this nightly pass, because this name has fewer than 8 own-history points so far.

Score history

Event-anchored

Illustrative history — each point corresponds to a scoring trigger (filing, announcement, or initial coverage). At launch a name has a single point.

Sources

Sources are the exact documents used by this assessment, recorded when it ran.

Metric history

P/Book

This figure is reported by EARN in its quarterly filing and only changes when a new filing is processed — a flat line here reflects real reporting cadence, not missing data.

Scores are analytical opinions, not investment advice. Figures reflect the most recent data available as of the assessed date and may differ from current market values.